A system with its own MCP server
If the supplier provides an MCP server, a workflow can use its tools. First we check who runs it and what it does with your data.
Gen8
Source: MCP, API and custom development
Managed AI service for SMEs. We set up, connect and manage; you stay in control.
© 2026 Gen8 VOF · Dutch Chamber of Commerce 92978789 · Delft
Integration · route: MCP
Most systems in an organization are not in a list of logos. A proprietary order package, an industry system, a database used for twelve years. Three routes exist for those systems: an MCP server, a direct API integration or custom development. They differ in cost, capability and how much maintenance stays with you.
At a glance
Route: MCP
Components: MCP servers, HTTP APIs, custom integrations
Capabilities
MCP. An MCP server exposes a system's functions as tools a workflow can call. More suppliers now provide their own. Gen8 can discover external MCP servers and use their tools in a workflow. This is the fastest route when the server exists and is well built — and the route where that server's provider determines what is possible.
API. If the system has a documented API, we build the calls your workflow needs with the system's required authentication. More work than MCP, but full control over which fields are read and written.
Custom development. No API, or a system accessible only through files, a database or a portal. We build the bridge: file exchange, a read connection to the database or another arrangement allowed in your environment.
The right route depends on more than technology. An unmaintained MCP server is a worse choice than a simple API integration you can read yourselves.
Inspiration
A few examples of work you can hand over through this integration. We work out what fits your organisation together during scoping.
If the supplier provides an MCP server, a workflow can use its tools. First we check who runs it and what it does with your data.
If your system has a documented API, we build precisely the calls your workflow needs, using your designated fields.
Only accessible through files, a database or a portal? We build the bridge within what your environment permits.
Permissions and data
Every route follows the same principle: the workflow receives the narrowest access needed to do its job. Read only where reading is enough, write only to fields the workflow needs.
An external MCP server adds another consideration. A third party defines its tools and may change them without your involvement. What that server does with received data is outside Gen8. Every external MCP server therefore raises the question of who runs it, where and whether that fits your data-processing requirements — a question for your administrator, not a workflow.
Credentials are stored encrypted, never in workflow text. Processing within Gen8 takes place in the EU; the external server or API's provider determines its location.
Control
A route determines how a system can be reached, not whether an action may happen without a person. That separate question is answered per action: reading usually needs no intervention, writing starts as a proposal with human approval, and only once an action is proven and reversible can it run automatically with logging.
For a route new to you, we deliberately retain approval longer than may seem strictly necessary. Not because the model is less reliable, but because a new integration reveals real-world edge cases in its first weeks.
Six questions · no account needed
This page covers the three routes remaining when there is no ready-made integration. Many systems do have one, making this the wrong page. In six questions, this scan identifies your systems' capability ceiling — native, configured, MCP or custom development — based on the integrations this platform itself has today. If you belong here, it says so plainly.
Reach a system without an existing integration
That is exactly the question for the process conversation. Three things determine the answer: whether the system has an API, whether a maintained MCP server exists and what your administrators permit.
That depends on who runs it and where. A vendor's own server differs from one published by an unknown party. Your administrator should weigh that choice, and we explicitly raise the question.
We agree and document that beforehand. With custom development this is a real cost, not a footnote — an integration nobody maintains eventually breaks.
Often yes. File exchange or a read connection is less elegant, but it works and can be checked.